AIG Study: Americans Evenly Split on Sharing the Road with Driverless Vehicles; Hacking a Major Concern, While Lower Insurance Costs Seen as Likely Benefit
AIG will release a comparison of the U.S. study with data from
Assessing Comfort Levels
Forty-one percent of survey respondents are uncomfortable with the idea of sharing the road with driverless vehicles, while 42 percent are generally ok with it.
A major stumbling block to acceptance is the perceived security of the vehicles, with 75 percent of respondents expressing concern that fully driverless vehicles, and even autos with autonomous features (emergency braking, lane departure avoidance, etc.), are susceptible to hackers taking control.
Sixty-seven percent worry that a cyber breach could expose personal data the vehicle may acquire, such as credit card information, when and where drivers travel, and Internet connections made from the vehicle. Even information such as whom the driver had in the vehicle and the potential for private conversations to be recorded registered as concerns.
A plurality (39 percent) believes driverless vehicles will operate more safely than the average human driver, though a substantial 27 percent felt they would not. When respondents were asked whether fully autonomous vehicles would operate more safely than they drive, 31 percent said no. The results show fairly even opinions among Americans about the safety benefit of driverless vehicles.
On the positive side, respondents were asked to select up to three perceived benefits of driverless vehicles. The most appealing benefits include:
- Easier/less stressful transportation (44 percent);
- Increased road safety (42 percent); and
- Lower insurance costs (39 percent).
Potential Risk Shifts
Overall, as more partially or fully autonomous vehicles hit the road, respondents see responsibility for accidents shifting away from individual drivers and more toward the auto manufacturers and software developers that enable the autonomous technology.
“As we move from autonomous features to fully driverless vehicles, risk
does not disappear – it shifts from humans to machines,” says
In one scenario where a fully driverless vehicle strikes a pedestrian, respondents felt the automaker (50 percent) and software provider (37 percent) would be most liable. Interestingly, 23 percent of respondents still see the vehicle’s occupant as having some form of liability, while 19 percent see the same for the vehicle’s owner. Not surprisingly, 81 percent of respondents think individuals who purchase or ride in fully driverless vehicles should still be required to have auto insurance.
For a similar accident involving a vehicle with automated assisted driving technology, the driver is seen as most liable (54 percent), though the automaker and software provider are still seen as substantially liable among respondents, at 33 percent and 27 percent, respectively.
Along with this shifting sense of risk toward the commercial components of the car, a plurality of respondents (35 percent) felt automated assistance systems or driverless vehicles should result in lower insurance premiums for the vehicle owner.
“The need for personal auto insurance will not go away as driverless
cars emerge. Though without doubt, we will see shifting of liability in
certain scenarios,” says
Timing Predictions
While most understand driverless vehicles are coming, respondents don’t believe they will be on the scene anytime soon. On average, Americans surveyed think it will take 22 years for driverless vehicles with no active input from human drivers to represent more than 20 percent of the vehicles on the road and that it will take 34 years before the autos make up the majority of vehicles in the U.S. The most significant factors cited as delaying or preventing the wide availability of driverless vehicles include (respondents could select up to three options):
- Costs will be too high (55 percent);
- Computer systems won’t be adequately secured (41 percent);
- People enjoy driving too much (41 percent); and
- The vehicles won’t be safe enough (35 percent).
This is the fifth in a series of studies by AIG on innovative
technology, including the
Editor’s Note: AIG’s Autonomous Vehicle Insights study was conducted
Additional information about AIG can be found at www.aig.com | YouTube: www.youtube.com/aig | Twitter: @AIGinsurance www.twitter.com/AIGinsurance | LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/aig. These references with additional information about AIG have been provided as a convenience, and the information contained on such websites is not incorporated by reference into this press release.
AIG is the marketing name for the worldwide property-casualty, life and retirement, and general insurance operations of American International Group, Inc. For additional information, please visit our website at www.aig.com. All products and services are written or provided by subsidiaries or affiliates of American International Group, Inc. Products or services may not be available in all countries, and coverage is subject to actual policy language. Non-insurance products and services may be provided by independent third parties. Certain property-casualty coverages may be provided by a surplus lines insurer. Surplus lines insurers do not generally participate in state guaranty funds, and insureds are therefore not protected by such funds.
View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20171003005825/en/
Source: AIG
AIG
Media:
Matt Gallagher, 212-458-3247
matthew.gallagher2@aig.com
Media:
Jessica
McGinn, 212-458-4215
jessica.mcginn@aig.com
Investors:
Liz
Werner, 212-770-7074
elizabeth.werner@aig.com